The Singapore Convention on Mediation

The Singapore Convention on Mediation, which opened for signature on 7th August, marked a defining moment in the Alternative Dispute Resolution world on a scale not seen since the introduction of the New York Arbitration Convention in 1959. Backed by 46 countries to date, including the world’s two largest economies, the United States and China, the Convention provides – for the first time – a route to enforcement of mediated outcomes for cross-border commercial disputes.

The Singapore Ministry of Law certainly pulled out all the stops to welcome representatives from over 50 countries to the signing ceremony, alongside various conference sessions on the virtues of an effective global environment for mediation.

Most legal professionals will agree that the strength of mediation lies in its collaborative approach. Both parties must reach a mutually agreeable outcome – a process, hopefully, free from rancour or malignancy.

There’s also the added financial bonus – settling disputes swiftly via mediation cuts out costs associated with arbitration or litigation, such as in instructing senior counsel.

But the benefits don’t stop there. As any seasoned PR professional will tell you, opting for mediation means disputes can be settled outside the censorious public eye. Often media choose to cast one party as the villain, another the victim – a labelling not always entirely based on the merits of each case. Fighting a PR war whilst trying to litigate, is an unenviable position to be in so there’s an attraction in privately mediated outcomes. To date the problem has been in enforcement – however the greater the number of countries committing to signing the Convention, the surer the chances of enforcement. We are confident the Singapore Convention will continue to attract support.

Far be it for us to herald the decline in litigation and related PR services, but it’s hard to disagree with the sentiment that mediating might both save you a few bob and safeguard your reputation.

19 August 2019

Litigation PR

Litigation PR
Babar Ahmad Babar Ahmad was arrested in London on 5 August 2004 following an extradition request from the US on allegations of terrorism, by dint o...
Litigation PR
U.S. copyrights dispute Bell Yard has assisted members of an iconic British band from the 80s, seeking to take advantage of US statute which allows for the rev...
View more Ligitation PR Case Sudies


Reputation Management
Separating personal from professional Bell Yard’s advice was sought in respect of handling media enquiries into the extra-curricular activities of a member of Chambers, wi...
Reputation Management
Employment dispute Bell Yard advised a UK set on the preparation of appropriate reactive public engagement, drafting internal and potential external commu...
View more Reputation Management Case Sudies


NatWest Three Bell Yard advised three former NatWest executives who faced extradition to the US, in both their Judicial Review of the decision of the...
Chris Tappin Bell Yard assisted Chris Tappin and his family in attracting media interest in the absurdity of his extradition to the US. After his ap...
View more Campaign Case Sudies

Contact us

Bell Yard Communications Limited
21 Fleet Street

Sw: +44 (0) 20 7936 2021

M: Melanie Riley, Director: +44 (0) 7775 591244